Security and Governance Engineered Into Every Client We Serve.

Our active compliance engineering capabilities cover HIPAA and HITECH for healthcare platforms, PCI DSS Levels 1 through 4 for payment card environments, SOC 2 Type I and Type II for cloud and SaaS platforms, ISO 27001 for information security management systems, GDPR and UK GDPR for platforms serving European data subjects, CCPA and CPRA for California consumer privacy, ISO 26262 and ISO 21434 for automotive safety and cybersecurity programs, UNECE WP.29 for connected vehicle OTA governance, FSMA and GLOBALG.A.P. for food supply chain traceability, WCAG 2.1 AA for digital accessibility, and regional frameworks including India PDPB, UAE PDPL, Singapore PDPA, and Australia Privacy Act.

Compliance is treated as a continuous engineering discipline at Junkies Coder, not a post-development audit exercise. We begin every engagement with a compliance scope mapping session that defines every regulatory framework applicable to your platform. Security architecture decisions are made with compliance requirements documented before development begins. Compliance controls are delivered as first-class sprint items alongside functional features. Automated security testing including SAST, DAST, and dependency scanning is integrated into the CI/CD pipeline from sprint one. Third-party penetration testing is completed before every production release. The result is a platform that arrives audit-ready without a separate compliance remediation phase.

Yes. Many healthcare and digital health platforms require simultaneous HIPAA and GDPR compliance — serving US patients whose PHI is governed by HIPAA while also handling data from European users whose health information qualifies as a special category under GDPR Article 9. We architect unified compliance frameworks that satisfy both standards simultaneously using a common controls approach, implementing PHI encryption and audit logging that satisfies HIPAA Security Rule requirements while also satisfying GDPR's technical and organizational measures obligations. This eliminates the duplication cost of treating each framework as a separate compliance program.

SOC 2 Type I assesses whether your security controls are suitably designed at a specific point in time — it is a design-level audit that can typically be completed within 2 to 3 months of control implementation. SOC 2 Type II assesses whether those controls are operating effectively over an observation period, typically 6 to 12 months, producing the audit report that most enterprise clients require before approving vendor onboarding. Junkies Coder engineers the control environment required for both, typically recommending that clients pursue Type I certification first to validate control design before entering the Type II observation period, with the complete Type II report as the commercial objective.

ISO 27001 certification timeline depends on the size and complexity of your information security scope and the maturity of your existing security controls. For organizations starting from limited baseline controls, the typical timeline from gap assessment through Stage 1 and Stage 2 certification audits is 9 to 14 months. Organizations with existing security programs and documented controls can often achieve certification in 6 to 9 months. Junkies Coder accelerates this timeline by implementing controls as part of sprint delivery rather than as a separate compliance workstream, and by preparing audit documentation concurrently with control implementation rather than after development is complete.

Yes. Third-party penetration testing is a standard component of our compliance-engineered delivery process for all regulated platform programs. We commission independent penetration testing by certified security professionals, CREST-certified or OSCP-qualified depending on the regulatory requirement, against threat models specific to your platform's compliance framework. HIPAA-regulated platforms receive healthcare-specific attack scenario testing. PCI DSS environments receive testing aligned with PCI DSS Requirement 11 specifications. Web application platforms receive OWASP Top 10-based testing. All penetration test findings are remediated before production go-live and the final report is included in your compliance documentation package.

Yes. Compliance remediation for existing platforms is a common engagement type for us. We begin with a structured gap assessment that evaluates your current architecture, data flows, access controls, encryption implementation, audit logging, and development processes against the specific requirements of your target compliance framework. The gap assessment produces a prioritized remediation roadmap with implementation effort estimates and risk severity classifications. We then implement the remediation controls as a structured engineering program, preparing the complete audit documentation package in parallel. For platforms with significant compliance debt, we typically phase remediation to address the highest-risk gaps first while maintaining platform operational continuity.

Our compliance delivery packages include all documentation required to support formal certification audits and enterprise procurement security reviews. Standard documentation deliverables include information security policies aligned to the applicable framework, risk assessment and risk treatment plan documentation, control matrix mapping platform controls to specific framework requirements, system architecture diagrams with data flow documentation showing PHI or cardholder data scope, penetration test reports with remediation evidence, vulnerability management records, access control and key management documentation, incident response procedures, and business continuity plans. For SOC 2 programs we additionally prepare the complete management assertion and control description documentation required for auditor review.